Research Digest 016

Christopher G. Nixon
Greenhouse Gas Scientist

In this article

The Highwood Bulletin is our way of sharing what we learn. We publish regular updates on emissions management news, novel research, and special insights from our team of experts and our partners.

Share

A Comparison of Methane Intensity: Methane Loss Rate vs. Energy Intensity

Methane loss metrics are compared for oil and gas producers in Canada and the US. The study finds that gas producers perform better for methane loss rate (methane lost per methane produced). However, oil producers perform higher regarding energy intensity (methane lost per energy produced). The authors explain that the methane loss rate is intuitive, but describes an incomplete picture of the diverse oil and gas industry. Highlighting that the EU’s methane regulation requires separate maximum methane intensity values for crude oil and natural gas, the study recommends to report both metrics here.

Seymour, S., Xie, D., Kang, M., Schwietzke, S., Zavala-Araiza, D., & Hamburg, S. (2025). Methane emission intensity metrics: unmasking the trade-offs.

Elevated Wintertime Methane Emissions at Production Sites

By inverting 2008-2021 ground and airborne measurement data, winter methane emissions across the U.S. are found to be approximately 40% higher than the summer. Although previous studies have shown an increase in urban winter methane emissions, this does not appear prominently in this study’s national-level seasonality analysis. The authors report the enhanced winter methane levels as primarily located in production areas; however, the authors do not believe that the elevated winter methane levels are related to leakage from underground storage. Suggesting gathering and transmission infrastructure as a possible explanation, the authors recommend identifying the specific processes causing higher wintertime emissions here.

Hu, L., Andrews, A. E., Montzka, S. A., Miller, S. M., Bruhwiler, L., Oh, Y., … & Houwelling, S. (2025). An Unexpected Seasonal Cycle in US Oil and Gas Methane Emissions. Environmental Science & Technology.

Duration of Super-Emitters in New Mexico Permian Basin

500 super emitting sources were detected by Carbon Mapper during an 18-day aerial campaign over the New Mexico Permian Basin in April 2024. Although this study found most super-emitters occurred on the time scale of hours, a small subset of compressors were persistent for the entire campaign, and are identified as a near term opportunity for mitigation. The authors attributed each event to infrastructure type, further finding compressors to be the most common and persistent super-emitting category in this campaign. The authors recommend frequent aerial campaigns to validate emissions reporting and identify mitigation opportunities here.

Cusworth, D., Bon, D., Varon, D. J., Ayasse, A., Asner, G., Sherwin, E. D., … & Biraud, S. (2025). Duration of Super-Emitting Oil & Gas Methane Sources.

Non-Producing Well Emissions Underestimated in Canada

Direct measurement of 494 non-producing wells across Canada found total emissions to be approximately 7 times higher than reported in the National Inventory Report. This study estimates non-producing wells to account for 13% of fugitive emissions in Canadian oil and gas systems. The authors recommend understanding both the emitting component (such as wellhead/surface casing vent) and the spatial scale (such as national/provincial) to identify high emitter attributes, which can help prioritize mitigation and reduce costs, here.

Klotz, L. A., Woolley, L., Lamarche, B., Boutot, J., & Kang, M. (2025). Sevenfold Underestimation of Methane Emissions from Non-producing Oil and Gas Wells in Canada. Environmental Science & Technology.

EPA Underestimates Carbon Intensity of US Natural Gas

A data- informed, high resolution carbon intensity map is developed for US oil and gas; natural gas life-cycle carbon intensity is estimated for 1 million active wells, accounting for 94% of US production in 2022. Methane measurement data from the latest aerial campaigns reveals that fugitive emissions account for 73% of the upstream carbon intensity and venting for 16%. The authors report these sources as an order of magnitude higher than the carbon intensity contribution of flaring activities. The emissions estimated by this study are more than twice the US EPA estimates; the authors further caution that overlooking the super-emitter activities in GHG assessments has previously underestimated natural gas carbon intensities, and recommend near-real time methane detection through future satellite monitoring here.

Zhang, Z., Rutherford, J., Littlefield, J., Ramadan, F., Saafi, M. A., Ren, B., … & Brandt, A. (2025). High-Resolution Carbon Intensity of United States Natural Gas Supply.

Global Emissions Estimates from Satellite Data

2023 global methane emissions from energy sector point sources are estimated with GHGSat satellite data, a total of 8.3 Mt from 3114 attributed sites. Detected oil and gas sites are found to be emitting 15% of the time, and detected coal sites 48% of the time. The authors note a lack of agreement between the top-down GHGSat estimate and the bottom-up Global Fuel Exploitation Inventory, and suggest a measurement informed inventory approach to be beneficial here.

Jervis, D., Girard, M., MacLean, J. P., Marshall, D., McKeever, J., Ramier, A., … & Scarpelli, T. (2025). Global Energy Sector Methane Emissions Estimated by using Facility-Level Satellite Observations.

Detecting Offshore High-Emitters with Satellites

The EnMAP and EMIT satellite-based methane detectors are assessed for the detection of offshore methane plumes. Because water tends to absorb the same wavelengths of light used for detecting methane, satellites typically struggle with offshore methane detection. However, this can be alleviated with the sun glint method: geometries between the sun and satellite that produce a mirror-like reflection. This study finds that the instrument’s spatial resolution and the amount of light collected by the instrument most impact plume POD. The authors state that the satellites are able to detect high-emitting offshore point sources, and optimization methane detection by filtering data here.

Roger, J., Guanter, L., & Gorroño, J. (2025). Assessing the Detection of Methane Plumes in Offshore Areas Using High-Resolution Imaging Spectrometers. EGUsphere2025, 1-32.

Review of 6 Methods for Offshore Methane Quantification

Previous studies directly measuring offshore methane emissions are critically reviewed. Component-level measurement, downwind dispersion, tracer-flux, mass balance, and remote sensing methods are described. Unusual quantification behaviour is noted, which may be due to decoupling of the marine boundary layer, which may cause:

  • A high bias in aircraft remote sensing
  • A high bias in mass balance measurements
  • A low bias in downwind dispersion measurements

The authors comment that guidance on marine boundary layer decoupling is not available, and recommend an offshore controlled release program here.
Riddick, S. N., Mbua, M., Laughery, C., & Zimmerle, D. J. (2025). A Review of Offshore Methane Quantification Methodologies.

Modelling Methane Mitigation from the Proposed PHMSA Rule

A techno-economic model is developed to assess the impact of Pipes Act of 2020 (PHMSA) on pipeline emissions. Key factors in current methods and PHMSA’s proposed rule are compared for LDAR effectiveness, pipeline material, installation age, corrosion rate, detection sensitivity, and survey frequency, and repair timeframe. The study’s results indicate that the proposed rules can greatly reduce pipeline emissions; the authors recommend future work to be focused on optimizing targeted approaches on mixed-material pipeline systems and stress the importance of quick repair in corrosion-prone pipelines here.

Strayer, A., & Ravikumar, A. (2025). FEAST-Pipeline: A Techno-economic Model to Assess Effectiveness of Methane Mitigation Policies Across Natural Gas Pipelines.

Successful Methane Mitigation in Romanian Oil and Gas Production

A follow up airborne remote sensing campaign in Romania shows an emission reduction of 20-80% from 2019-2021. The authors suggest the reduction is likely due to production infrastructure improvements following the first campaign in 2019, which has been further verified by site visits. However, the top-down estimate in this study is still higher than reported bottom-up emissions. The importance of measurement-based emission monitoring is emphasized within the study here.

Kuhlmann, G., Stavropoulou, F., Schwietzke, S., Zavala-Araiza, D., Thorpe, A., Hueni, A., … & Brunner, D. (2025). Evidence of successful methane mitigation in one of Europe’s most important oil production region. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics25(10), 5371-5385.

Christopher G. Nixon

Greenhouse Gas Scientist

The Highwood Bulletin is our way of sharing what we learn. We publish regular updates on emissions management news, novel research, and special insights from our team of experts and our partners.

Explore related content

Research Digest 015

With methane management under increasing global scrutiny, this edition of our research digest highlights emerging strategies and evaluation challenges across the natural gas value chain. We explore regional recommendations for methane mitigation in East Asian LNG markets, long-term performance testing of continuous monitoring systems, and the limitations of top-down measurement-informed inventories. Also featured are new insights into drone-based uncertainty analysis, temporal variability in basin-wide emissions, and aircraft-based quantification studies from Romania and West Africa.

The Highwood Bulletin 077

This month in the Highwood Bulletin, I bring you methane drama from satellites to summit rooms, with fewer leaks and more acronyms than ever before. From Chevron’s sky-patrolling robots to Alberta’s multi-million-dollar tech bets, and from space-era snags to EU export headaches, it’s a big month for anyone trying to track, report, or just spell OGMP 2.0 correctly.

Let’s work together on your emissions management and technology challenges.

Over 1,000 subscribers receive our weekly Highwood Bulletin.

Like what you are reading?

We send out similar content on a weekly basis to our Highwood Bulletin email list.

Subscribe now

Like what you are reading?

We send out similar content on a weekly basis to our Highwood Bulletin email list.

Subscribe now

To: nick.fane@highwoodemissions.com

Subject

Sign me up for the Voluntary Initiatives waitlist

To: nick.fane@highwoodemissions.com

Subject

Sign me up for the Measurement and Reconciliation waitlist

By downloading this tool, you acknowledge that Highwood and MiQ will have access to your information and may occasionally contact you in reference to your use of the tool. Your email and personal contact information will not be shared beyond Highwood and MiQ.

Please fill out the form and you will receive the download link via e-mail.

Please fill out the form and you will receive the download link via e-mail.